Saturday, December 22, 2012

Chapter Six-(2013)

FAMILY GET TOGETHER FOR DAD IN HOSPITAL.

On the following day, Saturday, before we made the long trip back up
here to the Waikato, lots of family members organised a get-together
for Dad in Hospital.

Following are some photo's and notes. Dad was very tired and
very unwell, but he made a huge effort to get ready and attend the
get together, but he did not have enough strength to continue for very long.

Above, we can see Mum and Dad when the Birthday cake is presented with
candles lit. Matthew has the cake that his wife Pauline kindly made for Dad.

Matthew is the son of Dad's daughter Janice, and in the background is his
daughter Sarah being held by his own Dad Mike.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dad is in his chair that the nurses bought him down on, and beside Dad is Mum,
and also Matthew and his three children Sam, Sarah and Aaron.
Another group sitting beside Dad is his daughter Carol, who sits beside her own
daughter Rachel, as well as Rachel's daughter Mishana, then Barbara and
her mother Helen.
Sitting beside Dad is Victor, whose dad is Trevor, my younger brother.
Mum is sitting beside Kelsey and her boyfriend. She is Victor's daughter.
Beside Dad is Kelsey. Behind Dad is Rachel and her mum Carol, with Matthew
in the doorway and my brother Trevor standing beside Dad.




Chapter Five-(2013)
George Leonard Pratt-(93yrs). (Our visit to see Dad in Hospital)

Our daughter Barbara took Helen and I down to see Dad
in Palmerston North Hospital last Thursday-20th Dec,2012.
She drove over from Tauranga and our first stop was at
Taupo. The picture shows my wife Helen and Barbara's
little 3 and a half  month old son Jake, during our lunch break.
When we arrived at the Hospital, Mum and my sister Janice were visiting
as they had been doing nearly every day with a 50 km trip up from Levin.

Dad had been diagnosed with terminal Cancer about 2 weeks previously on
our last trip down to see him on his last visit to Hospital.

He has been ill for many months, and has many problems and needs lots of
medical help and family support. Mum and my sisters Janice and carol have
been totally involved and towers of strength for Dad.

On some days, they have had up to 7 different visitors and a phone that
that was incessantly ringing.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Friday Barbara took Helen, Mum and Myself up to see Dad. He has lost
a tremendous amount of weight, and gets tired very quickly. His grandson
Kevin & Helen also arrived, and so did daughter Janice/Mike and their
families.


The picture above shows one of the nurse's at the
Hospice that attends to Dad's needs. He said they
are wonderful, are very busy and do a wonderful job.


Kevin is the son of Dad's daughter Delwyn, and also
pictured is his wife, also called  Helen and daughter Felicity who also visited.
They bought Dad a lovely card for his 93rd birthday and also the beautifully fragrant roses which can be seen
up on the shelf where dad asked Kevin to place them so he could see them.




 Peeping around the corner is our daughter Barbara who had Jake in his pram, and she was
feeding and moving the pram up and down the corridor to have a sleep. He is really
great, always alert, sleeps so well, drinks well and takes everything in his stride. Barbara
has really great understanding and good routines with him
 The staff surprised Dad with this lovely chocolate Birthday cake. We all enjoyed
a big piece each.
 Mum and Dad together. Mum is 90 years old and we came down a few weeks
ago for her birthday. Helen and I took her down town and and she passed all the
tests and got her Licence renewed against her expectations. Mum and Dad have
been married for over 71 years. I showed Dad this photo on the digital replay
and although he had been in pain all day, was being treated for an eye problem, he
was able to joke about  looking like a pair of ghosts in the picture.

Little Jake, wide awake again with his grandma, Helen.
He is the youngest of about 75 descendants that Mum and Dad have,
but there are more coming..

Tuesday, December 18, 2012


Chapter Four-(2013 series of articles)
NOTES for Breeders Cup, New Zealand Yearling Sales, Champion Sires

1…The inaccuracies which are detectable in the pedigree of both the sire and dam of Breeders Cup winner MUSICAL ROMANCE which I wrote about in Chapter 3-(2013) article, bought to mind one of the many chapters that I wrote last 
year on quite an amazing new discovery which assesses the potential of stallions.

2….This method is revolutionary, and relies on accurate
pedigrees. It also picks up all parts of the pedigree that
do not match, so can be very predictive.

3….I’ve collected 15 generation pedigrees of 693 Champion Sires from around the world, found references to their racing ability, and found information about their first 62 ancestors regarding winnings, wins and breeding ability.

4…Remarkably, the majority conform to an exceptionally high intensity formula.

5…Here are some of my thoughts when I researched
about incorrect pedigrees regarding what other people
have written. My own research would go into volumes
and I could give hundreds of instances where the pedigree is obviously false in certain areas.


STALLION PRINCIPLES
SUPER EIGHTEEN METHOD -JAN 2012….
INCORRECT PEDIGREES.

1….This new method of SUPER EIGHTEEN needs some very
intense crosses to qualify, and unless it encompasses all the pedigree, crosses that appear in the pedigree and would normally be counted, in this format , unless they adhere to a mathematical rule, now they are not counted. 

2….Of course, this method is TOTALLY RELIANT on
ACCURATE PEDIGREES.

3….This means record keeping and recording has to be accurate,
and there are big pitfalls here, because some physical working people are not good at recording. Some people rely on memory, and this is not always accurate, because some facts get forgotten, some facts get mixed up, but worst of all, when money and prestige are at stake, some people can be down-right dishonest.

Throughout history, there are thousands of cases where people lie or fabricate, and manipulate the truth for their own ends.

4…The early pedigrees (c 1665 to 1724) involved about 160 early Eastern imported horses and when they arrived, none of them have surviving recorded pedigrees beyond themselves.
 The Arab’s were avid pedigree people and could recite pedigrees for generations for their best and prized animals, so they had pedigrees, but these pedigrees were not forthcoming with each of the imported animals.

5… Because Arab’s jealously guarded their best bloodlines, it can be assumed that many of these imports into Gt Britain were acquired from second best strains or by nefarious means.

 6….About 120 of these early imported sires were named after their owner, like Darley’s ARABIAN, Lister’s TURK, D’Arcy’s White TURK, Leedes ARABIAN, and the SUPER EIGHTEEN method cannot be applied to these early horses with no known background pedigree.

7….To further mess up pedigrees, one authority claims one
stallion changed hands over 11 times and his name and identity changed every time to identify himself with each of his new owners, and another was disguised in early pedigrees under nine distinctly different names and ownerships, and others are mooted to have had two or three different names.

8….Another problem here is that owners kept their own pedigrees and records, and did not publicly publish them. Some owner’s records got lost over time, and some owners were not interested, or did not keep records.

9…When a STUD BOOK came into being in England in 1791,
it was over a hundred years after the breed had been developed
into a uniform breed, and trying to get pedigrees right after
a hundred years would be almost an impossible task for
the WEATHERBY family from 1791 onwards.

10…They used the collections of quite a few predecessors who
had made brave attempts for a few years each, but all failed
on accuracy and patronage terms.

11….A previous researcher CHENY,  “took trouble to get his pedigrees RIGHT, but his success was PATCHY.””
POND and HEBER tried to collect and publish pedigrees for some years.
HEBER said” MISTAKES ARE UNAVOIDABLE”
“Many horses were unnamed, many shared the same name and
much confusion existed. Many horses were left out. Relying on
some owners was no guarantee of accuracy.”
“PICK had a collection of pedigrees of even more doubtful heritage”

12….“The GENERAL STUD BOOK(1791) was inevitably and unavoidably filled with errors of all kinds”
“WEATHERBY apologized for the many errors”
MONTGOMERY-“has spent many days investigating the
General Stud Book. It is replete with false pedigrees, doubtful
pedigrees, and absolutely impure ones”

13….WILLETT.. “early methods of recording pedigrees were unsystematic, inconsistent and frequently inaccurate”
BRUCE LOWE…a great researcher and developer of breeding
by the FIGURE SYSTEM made many mistakes when compiling
his pedigrees, so it’s easy to see how hundreds of other less able, less knowledgeable, and less qualified people would also make many mistakes.

14….Many people made mistakes, or were inaccurate on some
pedigrees, but the biggest problem is that following generations blindly copied these mistakes forward into future generations.

15….A big attempt at trying to understand or correct pedigrees
can be seen at such great recommended Internet sites as:
-----INBREEDING-Incestuous matings of the Thoroughbred ----------racehorse ..James Hardiman
-----Thoroughbred Bloodlines…Patricia  Erigero
-----Who’s Your Momma?....Patricia Erigero
------Thoroughbred Bloodlines…Lord Rockingham’s collection of pedigrees..by A.J.HIBBARD.
-------The Spots.. by Miodrag Milovanovic and Anthony Byles
-------Bloodlines by Elizabeth Ross
-------Foundation Matriarchs of the Thoroughbred…C Matthes

16…..WEATHERBY…in his Introduction to a stud Book…..
“to correct the increasing evil of false and inaccurate pedigrees”
“The register was calculated to REDUCE the risks of fraud and
genuine cases of mistaken identity.”

17….COLONEL BRUCE.. compiler of an early USA Stud Book,” had many detractors because of his inaccurate and
openly criticised fraudulent work of recording pedigrees.…”
…..“impurity of the American Stud Book”
…..“doubts about reliability of Colonel Bruce’s work”
…..‘he did, in various, numerous instances, high-handed and unwarranted things which the facts, the evidence and the testimony extant, stamp as indefensible”

18….HERVEY comments.. ”BRUCE was dependent on the patronage of leading American Breeders in order to publish his work, and this dependence disposed him to give uncritical acceptance to the pedigrees offered to him.”

“he shovelled into the Stud Book pedigrees so impossible as be nothing less than absurd, and this gave to outrageous fiction the official stamp of veracity.”

“to trained scrutiny, the omissions, errors and contradictions
were so obtrusive as to become both exasperating and inexcusable.”

19Recent studies along the dam-line Mitochondrial DNA has
shown conclusively that there are many errors in the General
Stud Book. Reference should be made to the excellent articles
written by Patricia Erigero…”the study implies that the pedigree of virtually every thoroughbred today is incorrect in one or more branches of its’ family tree” 



20…To combat the present day errors of identifying horses, the NZ and Australian Stud Book authorities have followed other
Stud Book’s by demanding branding of foals when on the dam with a unique stud brand, plus a consecutive foaling number,
plus a numeral to signify the year the horse was foaled.

21…Even with these safeguards, over 300 foals were disqualified from the 1993 Australian Stud Book because of false pedigrees or mismatching, or different parentage to that stated, and picked up by Blood Typing of the supposed parents being
compared with the foal put forward for that parentage.

22….Freeze branding came into New Zealand in 1970 after iron branding to distinguish or identify foals and yearlings.
Complex systems of recording mares served, on what dates and by what identified stallions have been in vogue for quite some time, yet errors are still made.

23….A stallion return with all information is sent to the Racing Conference after mares were served giving full details of
mating dates, full particulars of each mare regarding colour,
markings, owner, and parentage of the foal.
Then after foaling a year later a further return is lodged showing the colour, sex, and markings of all the foals.

24…A return is also made for each mare, so her full particulars can be recorded in the Stud book.

Then, mares and stallions were blood-typed, so foals can be checked against their parents to verify their correct parentage.

25….This has resulted in dozens of inaccurate pedigrees being picked up each year.
Now, DNA and chips are being used to establish and verify correct parentage.

26….In the 1993 (Volume 38) of the Australian Stud Book,
The Parentage Validation Program established that there
were about 324 mares or instances where mistakes were
made in reporting or recording, and the Blood typing or
DNA picked up the anomaly. These published findings
can be seen at the back of that Stud Book.

27….During over 30 years of critically studying pedigrees, we have found dozens of really good sires that have clearly missed the boat in established and proven methods of breeding in their pedigrees.

28….The SUPER EIGHTEEN method uses a full pedigree base and is proving exceptionally accurate in identifying pedigrees, and also parts of a pedigree which are very suspect for accuracy.

29….They have added a confirmation of error on just about all the pedigrees we have been extremely doubtful about over the years. 

30….Importantly, they have also shown a value added component and verification for a few sires that we could not absolutely double tick before.

31….We are extremely happy with them now, because this method is very intense, and utilizes all parts of a pedigree.

32….Overall, the intensity makes the pedigree validity exceptionally good and very satisfying because there is now a method available to provide a standard for excellence and also one for comparison.


Chapter Three-(2013 series of articles)
NOTES for Breeders Cup, New Zealand Yearling Sales, Champion Sires


2011 – Filly & Mares Turf -Prize money=$2,381,000 -Nov 4, 2011

1….7 furlongs…1m23.47…..won by 1 ¼, head.
2….There are some very good race fillies here.
-----------------------------Musical Romance…15wins19p$3,140,200
-----------------------------Switch……………..10wins$2,498,200
-----------------------------Her Smile………….4w$427,860
-----------------------------Pomeroy’s Pistol…..5w$643,100
-----------------------------Turbulent Descent…13w$2,099,100

Fin Position----Horse---- Level-------Close--------Bal-----Blue--Chains
1-MUSICAL ROMAN’--15.125**4--4x5**1=---55**4--4**4=--655**3
2---SWITCH--------------19.406**1--4x5**1=----63**2--8**1---675**2
3---HER SMILE----------18.070**2--5x7**5-----62**3--7**2---726**1
4--POMEROYS PIST’---17.391**3--4x5**1=---37**5--5**3---627**5
5-TURBULENT DESC’-14.578**5--4x5**1=---84**1--4**4=--628**4

Four of these fillies had a nice 4x5 basic first cross. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th
Placed fillies had very nice high levels of line-breeding. The enigma
is the winning filly which has lower line-breeding level and a dam that has several
good principles, but 4 parts of it’s pedigree with possible inaccuracies based on
 known principles, and the sire has basic principles which would work, but
 several others are missing which complicates the assessment of  the winning
 filly Musical Romance.
Fin Position----Horse-----Intro-----Fem4-----Match-----F4------3Gen
1-MUSICAL ROMAN’--11**4=---52**4------95**3---19**2---5.07**4
2---SWITCH--------------14**1=---45**5-----111**2---16**3---5.33**3
3---HER SMILE----------13**3----94**1-----156**1….30**1--9.60**1
4---POMEROYS PIST’-14**1=---75**3------76**5----12**4=-4.73**5
5-TURBULENT DESC’-11**4=--79**2------81**4….12**4=--7.53**2

2nd and 3rd placed fillies again measure up extremely well here.

Fin Position----Horse-----5Gen-----TMale-----TFemale-----AMale-----
1-MUSICAL ROMAN’--7.14**5------31**1=-----18**4-----10.29**4
2---SWITCH--------------7.38**4-------30**3=-----13**5----11.61**1
3---HER SMILE----------7.43**3------31**1=------21**3-----9.65**5
4---POMEROYS PIST’--8.27**1------30**3=------23**1----11.45**2
5-TURBULENT DESC’-8.22**2------29**5--------22**2----10.74**3

The 4th and 5th placed fillies which were good winners, also showed up
very well on the above principles.

Fin Position----Horse----- AFemale-----DamW-----DamS----DamSW---
1-MUSICAL ROMAN’---4.23**4---------6**4------23**3-------9**2
2---SWITCH---------------3.39**5--------21**1=----28**1------13**1
3---HER SMILE-----------5.45**2--------21**1=----10**5-------2**5
4---POMEROYS PIST’---5.35**3-------16**3------27**2-------3**3=
5-TURBULENT DESC’--5.97**1---------5**5------14**4-------3**3=

All 5 fillies showed impressive levels of selection and numbers for
each of these principles, and allied to extremely good ancestry, it
is clear why these fillies were contesting a high class, valuable race.


Fin Position----Horse------ Pre%--------15G-----------Ped/SW
1-MUSICAL ROMAN’----33**5-------54**3--------414/661=1075**5
2---SWITCH----------------69**2-------50**4---------836/943=1779**2
3---HER SMILE------------66**3------55**2----------672/848=1520**3
4---POMEROYS PIST’----61**4------40**5-------1123/1194=2317**1
5-TURBULENT DESC’---85**1-------70**1---------744/675=1419**4

Having a quick look at the pedigree of Turbulent Descent, we notice she
has won 13 races and earned $2,099,100. She ran 5th in this race and was
fourth in the numbers of SW her first 31 sires sired in total. Sources vary, and
  each week the total can change, but it does give some kind of
comparison, and when the pedigree is checked, the stallions in the pedigree
 become more meaningful.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 744 SW in her sire’s pedigree look something like this…
Congrats-6, APIndy-140, Seattle Slew-114, Mr Prospector-192,
 BoldReasoning-10, Secretariat-57, Raise a native-78, Northern Dancer-147.

The 675 SW in her dam’s pedigree look something like this..
Forestry-42, Storm Cat-180, Seeking The Gold-92, Storm Bird-63,
Pleasant Colony-78, Mr Prospector-192, Slew o’Gold-28.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I did a few hundred of these Breeders Cup pedigrees, and after adding
up all the SW out to 5 generations,  I did a check with the totals to
4 generations which was much quicker, and in over 90% of the cases
there was no change in the order of the total for the horses being checked.
 Will save a lot of time in the future.

SUMMARY.

Except for the winning filly, Musical Romance, the Breeding Principles
Got the 2nd and 3rd grouped OK, and the 4th and 5th grouped OK.

Sunday, December 16, 2012


Chapter Two-(2013 series of articles)
NOTES for Breeders Cup, New Zealand Yearling Sales, Champion Sires

1….One mile…Turf… 1m 38.90…Won by ¾ length, 1 ¼ lengths.

2……Stephanie’s Kitten  and Stopshoppingmaria were very close together at the end of the mile race, and both shared the same number of points (51) over all the principles we checked out. The third horse just over a length behind on the racecourse  just pipped them on points, (49) but again the principles sorted out the best three, and 4th and 5th placegetters were well behind on points as well, with 73 and 62 respectively.

3…..This is the 2nd of 30 Breeders Cup races run at the 2011 and
2012 meetings. All the pedigrees have been compiled, and the principles
searched for and recorded. Just need to find the time to get them
published on the Blog over the next few months.

2011 – Juvenile FilliesTurf-Prize money=$1,190,500-Nov 4, 2011
Fin Position----Horse---- Level-----Close-----Bal--------Blue----Chains
1-STEPHANIES KIT’---18.883**1--4x4**1--65**3----8**1----738**1
2-STOPSHOPPINGM’--16.063**4--5x4**3--61**5----5**2=--692**3
3---SWEET CAT---------17.532**2--6x5**5--56**2----4**4----727**2
4---UP----------------------14.008**5--5x6**4--76**1----5**2=--660**5
5---HARD NOT TO L’--16.727**3--3x5**1--62**4----3**5----665**4

The winner had the most line-breeding, was equal closest on distance,
first on Blue method as well as being first with the most lines back to
important common ancestors.

Fin Position----Horse----- Intro-----Fem4-----Match-----F4------3Gen
1---STEPHANIES KIT’--12**3=  90**2----146**1   21**2=   3.33**5
2---STOPSHOPPINGM’-13**2…59**5----126**3…23**1…4.67**3
3---SWEET CAT----------10**5…79**4----140**2…21**2=--3.67**4
4---UP-----------------------14**1…112**1----81**5…13**4…5.00**2
5---HARD NOT TO L’---12**3=…85**3----94**4…12**5…5.40**1

Again the winner was best in the above five principles. Surprising, she had less wins in her ancestors to 3 generations. Speed and crosses must
have tapped some very good ancestry sources.

Fin Position----Horse------ 5Gen-----TMale-----TFemale-----AMale-----
1---STEPHANIES KIT’--- 6.70**4    30**2----19**3-------  9.71**4
2---STOPSHOPPINGM’---7.43**1…31**1----23**1-------10.74**2
3---SWEET CAT------------7.43**1---30**2----19**3-------11.10**1
4---UP-------------------------5.00**5---30**2----16**5--------9.42**5
5---HARD NOT TO L’-----6.78**3—30**2-----21**2--------9.87**3

2nd and 3rd horses cleaned up in this area. Mostly recording 1st or 2nd
places for the highest index scores, and the way they have raced here, and in other races, we can see they got benefit from their higher scores. 

Fin Position----Horse------ AFemale-----DamW-----DamS----DamSW---
1---STEPHANIES KIT,--- 3.90**3=-----11w **3=--17**2--- 3SW**4=
2---STOPSHOPPINGM,---4.35**1-------21w**1----27**1----6SW**1
3---SWEET CAT------------4.00**2-------11**3=------9**4=--4SW**3
4---UP-------------------------2.81**5-------12**2------14**3----5SW**2
5---HARD NOT TO LIKE-3.90**3=------11**3=-----9**4=---3SW**4=

The fighting 2nd horse Stopshoppingmaria cleaned up across this group
and was best rated horse in all 4 principle areas. No wonder she showed
a lot of ability and ran a great 2nd.

Fin Position----Horse------ Pre%-----15G-----Ped/SW
1---STEPHANIES KIT,-----73**2…63**2…1224/1198=2422**2
2---STOPSHOPPINGM,----71**3…62**3…1137/549=1686**5
3---SWEET CAT-------------61**4---48**4….1318/1311=2629**1
4---UP--------------------------50**5---40**5….1317/705=2022**4
5---HARD NOT TO L,------75**1…71**1…979/1059=2038**3

The winner showed good specs for hitting prepotency, and crosses to
15 generations, and had the 2nd most SW by all her sires. The 31
nearest sires in her pedigree had an impressive record where they
are recorded from various sources as siring 2,422 SW or superior gallopers. We have now found the Stakes Winners for over 7,700
stallions around the world, and when we compile a pedigree, it
very quickly shows the highly successful and less successful
stallions in the pedigree, and gives another dimension for comparing
and assessing pedigrees.

SUMMARY…The first 3 horses had the best combined record over
all the principles by a good margin.

Friday, December 14, 2012


Chapter One-(2013 series of articles)
NOTES for Breeders Cup, New Zealand Yearling Sales, Champion Sires

DOES ANYONE WANT TO SELECT, OWN, BET ON,
OR BREED A BREEDERS CUP WINNER?....

We have found some consistent principles appearing in many of the above groups pedigrees and following are some statistics and ideas which may help to point you a bit further in the right direction.

2011 –Jet Juvenile Sprint-Prize money=$595,200-Nov 4, 2011

1….A lot of research on the pedigrees of outstanding gallopers
around the world has been compared with  the fifteen 2011 and fifteen 2012 Breeders Cup races in the USA. Enclosed is the first of these selected races.

2…Perhaps other thoroughbred pedigree researchers may be
interested  in seeing some of the outcomes, so when I find time, I’ll try and get these thirty races all keyed up and added to my BLOG.
You can find it by using GOOGLE on this heading… LesPratt-Pedigree.

3…The serious researchers among you will appreciate just how much time is required to undertake this kind of research. Last year we spent   over three weeks on that group and another three weeks again this year in  just compiling all the 421 or so pedigrees and finding as much information about them as possible, so that valid comparisons could be made.

4…To make it more of a similar comparison under the same conditions, I’ve grouped  and compared horses in the same race, over the same distance, at the same time, and listed the 1st 5 finishers in each race.
This may take some of the variation away which usually confuses and can lead to inappropriate conclusions.

5…It is extremely difficult to compare sprinters with stayers, 2yos
with older horses, males with females, wet trackers with fast surface horses, but we have noticed there are general BREEDING PRINCIPLES that hold good across the board.

6…I’ve noticed some world class gallopers failing in some of these
races, and then winning handsomely in other big races, or even in
the same race the next year.

7…Although the pedigree is reasonably constant, the competition, jockey, distance, surface, position, horse’s condition, mindset, fitness can all vary from race to race. So, a horse’s overall record will give a better guide to it’s ability. However, the form of the horse on the day is very important, plus the knowledgeable better who is on course can also make judgements on the horses coat, sweating up, going scratchy, hock alignment, state of the track surface, how jockey or trainer is performing on the day, and other important factors on the day which could enhance or detract from a horse’s performance.

8…There are a number of punters and handicappers on the list like
Sir Harry, and  there may be a pointer or two here as well for them.
We would welcome any input you think may be of value or help.

9…There are other indicators as well. I have a few dozen other
breeding principles that could be listed, and of course we have
omitted mention of size, stride, class, finishing speed, course
preference/surface on the day, sweating up, over trained, coming
into form, time since last race, change in race distance, medication or niggling injuries, multiple experience/no experience on this track,
change of jockey, getting blocked in the race, pulling for it’s head,
getting carried wide, over racing, ideal/wrong position in the race,
virus/cough in the stable, or different abilities of the trainer/or jockey.

10…It is impossible to account for everything, so the best we can do  is to look at the information we deem to be more valuable and try and analyse and make as many comparisons as we can to make as much sense of the whole situation as we can.

11…Following is the first race comparisons for the 2011 and 2012
Breeders Cup races in the USA. All pedigrees have been compiled
out to 15 generations, racing performance found for the first 62
ancestors, and a lot of principles checked for comparison.

2011 –Jet Juvenile Sprint-Prize money=$595,200-Nov 4, 2011
6furlongs, 1m10.52, won by 1 length, 4 ½ lengths.


Fin Position----Horse-- Level---Close---Bal------Blue----Chains

1---SECRET CIRCLE-16.9**2--5x3**1-45%**5--4**3=-634**4
2---SHUMOOS---------18.6**1--4x4**1-58%**3---4**3--713**2
3---HOLDIN BULLETS--…..4………1=……..1……..1… …….3
4---SEEKER----------------…..5………5………4……..2……. …5
5---JAKE MO--------------…...3………3=…….2……..5…… ….1
In this first race, we notice ON THIS DAY, AT THIS TIME, there was a short length between 1st and 2nd horses. The barrier draw, placement, getting a good start, fitness, track conditions etc could all have a bearing and if any one of a dozen factors changed, then the result could have turned around for the first two horses, but they seemed to have a big edge on the next and following horses which were over 4 lengths behind.

In this speed event, the first 2 had the most line-breeding, and had the closest ancestor crosses, which normally are associated with speed.

Fin Position----Horse--- Intro----Fem4----Match----F4-----3Gen
1---SECRET CIRCLE--13**1=--86**2---108**2--15**2= -6.8**3
2---SHUMOOS-----------13**1=--72**4----96**3--15**2= -5.8**5
3---HOLDIN BULLETS--..…1=……..3……….4……..4… …….1
4---SEEKER----------------.….4……….5………4=…....5… …….2
5---JAKE MO--------------..….5……….1………1……..1… ……4

The first 2 horses had the most INTRO crosses and were consisatently in first few positions for Fem4, Match and F4 principles.
Fin Position----Horse------ 5Gen-----TMale-----TFemale-----AMale-----
1---SECRET CIRCLE-----7.6**4---29**5------21**2------10.6**4
2---SHUMOOS-------------8.0**2---31**1=----23**1-------12.0**2
3---HOLDIN BULLETS--……..1………3=……….4…………..1
4---SEEKER----------------……..5………1=……….5…………..5
5---JAKE MO--------------………3………3=………3………….3

The 5 Gen adding the wins of all ancestors in the first 5 generations
showed a good correlation, and so did having the most good racemares
in the pedigree, where 1st and 2nd had 21 out of 31 and 23 out of 31
of the mares in their pedigrees being good performers.

Fin Position----Horse---AFemale-----DamW-----DamS----DamSW---
1---SECRET CIRCLE-4.8**1-------5w**5-----10w**5--4SW**3=
2---SHUMOOS---------4.2**3-------13w**3----22w**3---7SW**1
3---HOLDIN BULLETS--…2………….4………….1…………5
4---SEEKER----------------...5…………..2……...…4……....…3=
5---JAKE MO--------------…4………….1……....…2……....…2

All 31 mares in the pedigree were averaging over 4 wins, with the 2nd horse having an extremely good family, where 13 wins were along his dam line, as well as 22 winners being produced along with  7SW.

Fin Position----Horse---- Pre%-------15G-----------Ped/SW
1---SECRET CIRCLE---92.8**1=--63%**1---1217/733=1950**2
2---SHUMOOS------------92.8**1=--45%**3--1082/1281=2363**1
3---HOLDIN BULLETS--……4…………..5---1088/675=1763**3
4---SEEKER----------------……2…………..4…979/479=1450**4
5---JAKE MO--------------…….5…………..2…580/735=1315**5

Both 1st and 2nd horse were way out in front on the Hitting Prepotency principle, and in crosses out to 15 generations index.
They also were the first two ranked horses when the SW sired by all
their first 31 male ancestors were added up and compared with the
3rd, 4th and 5th finishers.

SUMMARY..
When the points for position were added up, the Breeding Principles selected the first 3 horses in the first 3, and 4th and 5th as the last two.

Finished 1st…56points…selected 2nd
Finished 2nd….46 points…selected 1st
Finished 3rd….58 points…selected 3rd
---------------------------------------------
Finished 4th….81 points…selected 5th
Finished 5th….59 points…selected 4th
If bettors had bet on the first two selected horses, they could have
made a very good return with a good betting plan.  

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

KARAKA NATIONAL YEARLING SALE-2012

KARAKA YEARLING SALES-2012

1…There are just a few more weeks until the next National Yearling Sales gets underway in New Zealand.. This year there are 1,444 yearlings being offered, and thousands of people will be searching their way through all the pedigrees, and doing extensive physical examinations.

2…The PREMIER Sale starts on Mon 30 Jan, 2012, and finishes on Tues 31st and on offer are 516 lots being offered over the two days..
…..The SELECT Sale goes from Wed 1 Feb to Fri 3 Feb, and over three days 619 lots are carded to be auctioned.
…..The FESTIVAL Sale is a one day sale on Sun 5 Feb and a marathon 307 lots are catalogued for sale.

3…Last year for the 2011 sale, the 75% sold rate averaged $83,899
….and in the previous 2010 year, the sold ones averaged $82,876

4…If you are outlaying over $200,000 plus for Premier yearlings,
$50,000 plus for Select yearlings or $20,000 for Festival yearlings,
then you will need to have expert understanding and knowledge
of conformation, type, pedigree, and racing ability of ancestry, because the majority will not repay training costs, and the aim is to identify the one in every 17 to 19 that will possibly pay its way..

5…As a general guide, one historical method of assessment would
give an expectation for :
……..86 yearlings [about 16% of 516] from the Premier catalogue,
……..88 yearlings [14 % of 619] from the Select catalogue and
……. 30 yearlings [ 9% of 307]from the Festival catalogue
…….. to earn enough to repay all racing costs…
(DOES NOT INCLUDE PURCHASE PRICE!!)

6…It’s very hard to calculate repaying purchase price as well, and a
brave guess would be based on just averages, and there may still be a variance from the truth. However, if we look at the rounded $80,000 average purchase price for the sale, and add a basic $2,000 a month training bill, for 6 months a year, basic agistment, vet, farrier, transport, gear…then 4 seasons costs might approach $62,000 in New Zealand.

7…A quick check of how many horses earn in excess of $140,000 when we check with our list of 8,962 horses that raced in New Zealand over the last 8 or 9 years came up with 365..That means ABOUT 1 HORSE IN 24 WILL EARN ENOUGH TO REPAY PURCHASE OF ABOUT $80,000 AND CAREER RACING EXPENSES OF ABOUT $60,000.

8…Of course, some clever people may be able to purchase a top horse for a lot less than $80,000, or slip over to Aussie to earn a nice amount, or cut their agistment and racing expenses by training themselves, by floating horses themselves, so they may increase their ratio by diligent methods of cost cutting. A lucky or informed $25,000 purchase with career expenses of $35,000 only needs to earn $60,000 to be ahead.



This shows you need to get at least 10 or 12 ducks in a row.

9…The middle man agents make money on most purchases. They pay big money, astutely target interested people with the means to take shares, and manage the syndicates for their clients and provide very good communications to make them feel good. Trainers that spec buy and pass on horses to clients make management and trainer money on the horses they like physically and on their breeding, but the Owner or Buyer is the one that bears the brunt of the ever increasing costs and the unbusinesslike 24 to 1 odds against , or even 17 to 1 odds against which means most will lose money. The huge publicity around million dollar races and earners is a huge lure to thousands of newcomers and there seems to be a never-ending line of new owners wanting to chance their luck.

10…A few people make money from their sport (perhaps 1 in 17?) some astute owners target speed, early maturity and muscle and increase their chances of getting early trial winners, being more focused on the majority of races which are less than 1 mile (1600m). They can race more often, they can be sold more easily to buyers overseas because of their speed and muscle, and they can get more
of that steady demand for faster horses.

11…My general RULE OF THUMB is to expect that there will be only 1 IN ABOUT 17 YEARLINGS THAT WALK PAST YOU IN THE SALE RING WILL PAY ITS WAY, on average.
So buyers need to minimize their risks and know what good and bad conformation means, what type means, what speed means, what stamina means, and how faults will impact on a horse’s racing career, and know all about selection and performance in a yearling’s pedigree. This does not offer a GUARANTEE, but should increase your chances of not making basic mistakes and should increase your
chances of making a better selection.
All this work, knowledge and selection can go for NOUGHT, if your horse is not in the hands of a very successful professional. And even then, the best trainers who normally charge the most, also have more unsuccessful horses in their stable than horses that pay their way and recoup all racing expenses. Sometimes its best with a second tier
horse where there are too many horses in a stable and lots of decisions and handling gets delegated to stable employees that just
do not measure up to the best level for the best potential possible.

12…The figures do show very clearly that the breeders that own commercial stallions, have pursued and acquired commercial mares,
and prepare them for sale in the PREMIER SESSION sale are the ones that are making the largest gains in the horse industry.

13..They have acquired the best and most desirable bloodlines, have
a buyer bench hundreds of times their own number, feeding an ownership band thousands of time larger again, and each year are selling the majority of their yearlings at very high prices several times higher than their production costs.

14…My belief from looking at every pedigree of every Karaka yearlings for more than 12 years is that as a general guide about 86 out of 516 Premier Sale yearlings will probably earn enough to repay agistment, breaking and training expenses.
That means about 16%, and about 430 yearlings will fail to repay racing costs.

15…About 88 from the SELECT SALE-(about 14% guesstimate)
of 619 will repay training expenses, and 531 are expected to lose money.
About 30 (9%) of 307 FESTIVAL SALE yearlings should repay
training expenses, with 277 becoming losing ventures.

16…IF ANY ONE HAS MORE UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION,
AND WOULD LIKE TO MORE ACCURATELY UPDATE THESE GUESSES WITH ACTUAL FIGURES, I’M SURE WE WOULD BE ALL GRATEFUL.
To find every horse, list all earnings, and work out actual costs would be a mammoth task, but could be quite illuminating.
I would think that stallion owners, commercial breeders, syndicators
and auctioneers would not be very interested, because all their advertising is highly selective and reflects the merit of a few success stories at the top end, and tends to ignore the majority of failures at the lower end.
Selective advertising to bring new business shows the successes are usually highly accentuated and the many failures are suppressed or ignored. I’m sure we are all familiar with these business practices
in many of our daily dealings.

17…LINEBREEDING…looking at most traits, normally speed and
stamina have opposite connotations and a really good physical judge
of horses should be able to see a dozen factors for speed in the
conformation makeup of the yearling and over a dozen traits for
stamina. Many judges look for TYPE, but there are many more clues
to be seen in the physical make up of even immature yearlings.

18…We have looked at the line-breeding of all 1,444 yearlings and
it is possible to rank each pedigree on 7 basic methods. These methods all have different effects, and as they all exist simultaneously in each pedigree , the possible outcome can be wide and extreme. Some help speed, some help early speed, some help slower development, some assist fillies and speed, or stamina. Some line-breeding helps constitution, but a good knowledge of thousands of best and worst pedigrees is needed to understand the ramifications here. Watch out, because not all line-breeding is positive. Too much,
or too close, or too reversed, or involving certain ancestors can lead
to poor constitution, ill-thrift, light frame, crooked legs, bad alignment, nervousness, porous bone, brittle bone and dozens of
other unwanted conditions.

In respect of AMOUNT of line-breeding, 46 qualify as VERY HIGH
LINE-BREEDING in the PREMIER sale, 43 qualify on the same
scale in the SELECT sale, and 18 qualify in the FESTIVAL SALE.
All these should be inspected physically. I remember two high index
yearlings inspected, one had a bad turned right foot and won a race,
the other became a multiple Group 1 performer.
Make sure you combine highly selective pedigree scrutiny and
highly selective physical scrutiny.


19…FEM40 INDEX…this method involves a complicated series
of female crosses which only a computer can find, then do a complicated formula to find ratios which can be RANKED and COMPARED.

I’ve selected out those that are above 120%, and the best ones in each sale are: PREMIER… 81 yearlings…SELECT….71 yearlings…FESTIVAL..30..
These have the best promise, and are the ones to physically
check for size, growth, athleticism, movement, action, temperament
and leg conformation.

20..FEMALE….Because Nature allows a male to be a parent more than a hundred times in a year and a mare usually just one, there is a bias in favour of the male regarding selection. Therefore, because there could be up to a hundred times less males, only the very best bred, conformed and best performed are usually utilized to stand at stud.

This means if a hundred times more mares are retired to stud, by sheer numbers there will be many un-raced mares, unplaced, minor winners And moderately performed mares alongside the very good race-mares that also get retired to stud duty.

Just to emphasize this point, a check of the first 31 mares and first
31 sires in each of the 1,444 yearlings pedigrees in the 2012 Karaka Yearling Sales show that the SIRES in the pedigrees AVERAGED
over 9 wins (9.110 wins) and the DAMS AVERAGED just over 3 wins (3.187 wins.) WHICH IS A HUGE 6 WINS LESS ON AVERAGE PER HORSE BETWEEN ALL THE MALE ANCESTORS AND ALL THE FEMALE ANCESTORS, and as we are dealing with 44,764 males and 44,764 females, this is really a significant difference.

In this study 83 PREMIER yearlings, 104 SELECT yearlings, and 35
FESTIVAL yearlings have a 300% or more female index.

21..B13 METHOD. NATURE puts many controls into every operation and here is one of the MOST IMPORTANT, and is an overriding factor in explaining the exceptional success of just about every modern standout stallion that has proved exceptionally successful.

Applying the principle to the Karaka yearlings and looking at those
With a 130% or above rating, we find 85 PREMIER yearlings,
61 SELECT yearlings and 41 FESTIVAL sale yearlings qualify at
this level or above.

There is another more intense II800+ method that just about every double Champion sire in the world has, and a quick check shows
that SEVEN Colts in this sale have that, but of course they have to be checked very thoroughly for critical factors in their own sire,
dam, grandsire, necessary pre-potent crosses, size, muscling,
leg accuracy etc. A quick look shows that three of them would
fail the son/sire test immediately, and 2 more would fail the basic
desirable pre-potent line-breeding test.

22…BLUE METHOD…I’ve compared over 2 dozen of the greatest
TAP ROOT mares in the breed with the BLUE HEN LIST, with
GARVEY’S list of mares, with…SYLVIA ROSE’S list of multiple stakes producing mares, with 17,796 DAMS OF 1 SW, with 6524 DAMS OF TWO OR MORE SW, with DAMS OF 4 or MORE SW, with 12,675 brood-mares at stud in NZ and 23,553 current mares at stud in Australia.

This shows a high correlation between those that demonstrate
high class ability, compared with those that do not achieve higher success.

The best ones show there are 46 PREMIER yearlings, 53 SELECT
Yearlings and 16 FESTIVAL yearlings with scores at 100% or above.

23…CHAINS…This method looks way back into the pedigree and
links every line-bred ancestor with all duplicated ancestors in it’s
background.

This intensity has come up with 38 PREMIER, 31 SELECT, and
22 FESTIVAL yearlings that have a level of 100% or more. These
are the ones that should be short listed, then checked thoroughly
for the dozens of physical traits that suggest good locomotion,
stride efficiency, good reach, good muscling for speed, good
shape or muscling for stamina, and most importantly, tolerable
faults and leg accuracy along with temperament, early maturity
and constitution.

24…GEN200% CROSSES. 57 PREMIER, 52 SELECT and 55
FESTIVAL yearlings come to the fore for examination. These
yearlings should be listed with all the others that have advanced themselves to the front of their lists, and put into order of the ones
that are prominent on the most high ranking groups.

25….F4 & F5 METHODS…This is a favourite, and when several thousand of the GREATEST RACEHORSES in the world were identified, pedigrees extended, then this method showed one of the greatest range of differences of index between the CHAMPIONS and the horses on the lists that had very limited ability.

F4…PREMIER…55 yearlings, SELECT…63 yearlings, FESTIVAL yearlings 15
F5…PREMIER…38 yearlings, SELECT…38 yearlings, FESTIVAL yearlings 14

26…B50%…Different parameters and concept to the other B13
Lots of speed connotations. 13 PREMIER, 20 SELECT, 9 FESTIVAL yearlings rise to the top of the selection list.

27…INB130%..Big help with constitution..
……95 PREMIER yearlings to check,
……82 SELECT yearlings to check
……39 FESTIVAL yearlings to check

28…LM40% METHOD…Adds to REAL CLASS. .This is a feature
that is consistent in all the CHAMPIONS studied throughout every
country…42 PREMIER, 31 SELECT, 7 FESTIVAL

29….ALL3BEST…This is the mainstay grouping of line-breeding
methods. Big improvement in speed is always evident and is the
basis for a dozen other set-up principles.

The yearlings that this method identifies would have a significant
advantage over all other yearlings in their respective catalogues.
It identifies 27 PREMIER, 27 SELECT, and 9 FESTIVAL yearlings

30….PROVEN SIRES-40+SW…Buyers have always sought the progeny of the BEST sires. That usually means they have left MORE SW than other sires. NEW sires usually have impressive race records
and superior ancestry, but are just full of promise because they have not had the opportunity to prove themselves. The PROVEN sires have DONE THE JOB. No guessing, no relying on hope.
Less room for bias or prejudice, They have done the job
and give more confidence that their new yearlings will also be
up to the wanted STAKES WINNER level.

In this study, I’ve listed all 1444 yearlings, found how many
STAKES WINNERS each of their sires has left, then sorted
them in order. The cut-off level seems to be those PROVEN
sires that have left 40 OR MORE STAKES WINNERS.

This shows that 187 yearlings in the PREMIER sale, 56
yearlings in the SELECT sale and 0 yearlings in the FESTIVAL
sale are by these PROVEN sires. Obviously the yearlings have
been graded into the 3 sales primarily on this factor, and then
perhaps on vendor sales history and STAKES WINNERS along
the dam line.

31…4 DAMS-SW-5+
Looking along the dam line, and counting the number of SW
produced resulted in a delineation line of 5SW…
The theory here is that those families that are producing the most SW in the past have the best chance of producing the most SW in the
future. Looking at every yearling in the sale from those 2 yearlings
that have 13 SW in their first 4 dams , the 5 yearlings that have 11 SW, The 8 yearlings that have their first 4 dams producing 10 SW down to the 185 yearlings that have produced just ONE SW along their dam line, and the 54 yearlings that have 4 dams that produced NO STAKES WINNERS is quite illuminating.

204 yearlings out of 516-(39 % ) in the PREMIER SALE had 5 of more SW along their dam line.
134 yearlings out of 619 (21 % ) in the SELECT SALE had 5 or more SW along their dam line
33 yearlings out of 307 (11 % ) in the FESTIVALE SALE had 5 or more SW along their dam line.
Based on these figures, perhaps the first 60, 50 and 20 yearlings
with the most SW along their dam line would be the best ones to
short list for an exhaustive physical analysis.

32…31 DAMS of SW..
It’s important to LOOK THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE PEDIGREE, not just along the dam line where the catalogue gives a selective and highlighted abbreviation of the first 2, or sometimes 3 or 4 dams.
We have gone into the pedigree of all 1444 yearlings and compiled the Breeding record of all 31 dams in each 5 generation pedigree.
The PREMIER yearlings show 171 pedigrees where 27 or more of the dams throughout the pedigree are represented by 1 or more STAKES WINNING progeny.
The SELECT yearlings have 142 pedigrees which have 27 STAKES
PRODUCING dams.
The FESTIVAL yearlings have 69 pedigrees where 27 or more of the collective dams have produced 1 or more STAKES WINNERS.

33…WINNING ABILITY OF the first 4 dams along the Dam line.

Always nice to have that winning ability in a row along the dam line.
When we checked 7586 SIRES that have produced STAKES WINNERS, there are some really impressive and wonderful chains where two, three or four dams in a row had really outstanding ability. We can also name Dozens of sires where the dam and grand-dam were outstanding race-mares and it seems certain they have added an extra dimension to the stud ability of their exceptionally talented sons.

The PREMIER yearlings have 117 pedigrees where the first 4 dams
have a combined total of 16 or more wins between them. Many pedigrees do not have an extension to 4 generations on the catalogue
page, so we went into our computer files and other resources to find the race records for all of them.

The SELECT yearlings had 109 yearlings with over 16 wins won by
the first 4 dams.

The FESTIVAL yearlings had a lower score and only 32 yearlings
met the 16 win cut-off total by their first 4 dams.

34…WINNERS PRODUCED BY FIRST FOUR DAMS.
PREMIER yearlings were best with 200 pedigrees producing
TWENTY or more individual winners by their first 4 dams.
SELECT sale was 2nd with 175 measuring up with 20 plus wins
FESTIVAL yearlings came third with 49 pedigrees showing
up with 20 or more individual winners.

35…WINS BY FIRST 16 ANCESTORS and FIRST 62 ANCESTORS.

Those pedigrees which have more winners of big races in their near
ancestry would be expected to be better racing propositions than
those that have more limited racing records.

We looked at the wins by THE FIRST 14 ANCESTORS and also
the wins by all 62 ANCESTORS, and averaged them to see how
they compared.

PREMIER yearlings…..78 averaged more than 5 wins over 14 ancestors
SELECT yearlings…….74 averaged more than 5 wins over 14 ancestors
FESTIVAL yearlings….33 averaged more than 5 wins over 14 ancestors

PREMIER yearlings…..79 averaged more than 7 wins over 62 ancestors
SELECT yearlings…….52 averaged more than 7 wins over 62 ancestors
FESTIVAL yearlings.…23 averaged more than 7 wins over 62 ancestors


36…VERY GOOD RACEMARES IN ALL PEDIGREES TO 5 GENERATIONS.

There is an added advantage in pedigrees where there are many
better race-mares. We compiled the race record for all 31 race-mares
in each of the 1,444 yearling pedigrees to see which ones had the
biggest numbers of very good race-mares.

Looking at the range from the most good race-mares to the least
good race-mares, it seemed best to split at the 20 GOOD RACE-MARES level.

The results were.
PREMIER sale….127 yearlings had 20 or more good race-mares
SELECT sale……130 yearlings had 20 or more good race-mares
FESTIVAL sale…..61 yearlings had 20 or more good race-mares

1 yearling pedigree had 27 good race-mares out of a possible 31
in it’s pedigree, 2 had 26 good race-mares and 6 had 25 good race-mares. At the other end of the scale, 1 yearling had 9 good race-mares out of a possible 31 in it’s 5 generation pedigree, 3 had 10 good race-mares, and 10 had 11 good race-mares out of 31.

37….PREPOTENCY TOTAL %…over 84%.

This is a very strong breeding principle and covers multiple crosses
and each extra one lessens the chance of just luck influencing the
performance of the mating. There is an extra mathematical principle
involved which is extremely powerful, and when we checked
thousands of the best SW progeny of standout sires against thousands of their other progeny, a very strong correlation emerged
in favour of better performance.

Results for the 3 sales identified just about the right numbers to
match an expectation for horses that would pay their way and make a profit.

PREMIER…84 yearlings hit pre-potency at 84% or higher.
SELECT…..53 yearlings hit pre-potency at 84% or higher
FESTIVAL..24.yearlings hit pre-potency at 84% or higher

38…4X4P-250
The highest ranked yearlings with this very intense and complicated
breeding principle or method to 15 generations turned out to be:

PREMIER sale…60 yearlings
SELECT sale……55 yearlings
FESTIVAL sale….21 yearlings.

A check through the lists show a consistent pattern of repeat
yearlings that seem to appear with high indexes in many of
these listed principles.

The best way to proceed is to take the 33 yearlings that
have the consistent high indexes, check their sire and dam
for the ability to leave SW, check the necessary crosses,
check their type, speed, leg accuracy, make an assessment
on how they will grow and develop and what expectation
they promise in ways of speed, wins and money earning.
And then armed with this preliminary assessment, determine a realistic price for the yearling in the ring to give a profit after racing. We feel this method will eliminate a lot of poor buys, and will give the best chance to secure a future very good race-horse capable of
winning STAKES RACES.


.